All Journals > The Journal of Infectious Diseases > 15 July 2008 > Endothelial Cell Response to C. albicans

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

  • By Author
  • Search In

Announcements

Science Watch logo

JID Article Named "New Hot Paper" by ScienceWatch.com

Dr. Lauri Hicks' 2007 article on pneumococcal disease has been named a "hot new paper" by Thompson Reuters' ScienceWatch.com. Read a Q&A about the article with Dr. Hicks here

Press Release

Unique Collaboration Charts the Migrations of a Parasite that Affected History
Researchers Sequence Louse DNA from Mummies and Propose New Model for its Development


In the News

Featured in Grist
"Another symptom of swine flu: instant amnesia" May 11, 2009
Swine Influenza Virus: Zoonotic Potential and Vaccination Strategies for the Control of Avian and Swine Influenzas
Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke
Read the veterinary literature on swine flu and you get a strong sense of what might be called vaccination treadmill: the hog industry is literally scrambling to generate new vaccines for the rapidly evolving flu strains that sweep through CAFOs. Writing in the Journal of Infectious Diseases [PDF] in 2008, Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke of Iowa State University paint a stark picture: “A number of genetically diverse viruses are circulating in swine herds throughout the world and are a major cause of concern to the swine industry,” they write. “Influenza virus infections in swine and poultry are potential sources of viruses for the next pandemic among humans.”

Featured in New York Times
"Fear of a Swine Flu Epidemic in 1976 Offers Some Lessons, and Concerns, Today" May 8, 2009
Anti‐Ganglioside Antibody Induction by Swine (A/NJ/1976/H1N1) and Other Influenza Vaccines: Insights into Vaccine‐Associated Guillain‐Barré Syndrome
Irving Nachamkin, Sean V. Shadomy, Anthony P. Moran, Nancy Cox, Collette Fitzgerald, Huong Ung, Adrian T. Corcoran, John K. Iskander, Lawrence B. Schonberger, and Robert T. Chen
Irving Nachamkin, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, examined some 1976 vaccine that had been saved by a scientist in Texas. In a paper published last year in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, he and colleagues reported that mice given the vaccine made antibodies that reacted with gangliosides, which are components of nerve cells. An antibody attack on gangliosides is part of the disease mechanism of Guillain-Barré.

Featured in AFP
"Swine flu vaccine 'could be ready soon'" May 7, 2009
A Broadly Protective Vaccine against Globally Dispersed Clade 1 and Clade 2 H5N1 Influenza Viruses
Mary A. Hoelscher, Neetu Singh, Sanjay Garg, Lakshmi Jayashankar, Vic Veguilla, Aseem Pandey, Yumi Matsuoka, Jacqueline M. Katz, Ruben Donis, Suresh K. Mittal, and Suryaprakash Sambhara
The vaccine Mittal created for the bird flu worked on three different strains isolated over a seven-year period and was described in papers for the Journal of Infectious Diseases and the journal Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Featured in Newsweek
"The Path of a Pandemic" http://www.newsweek.com/id/195692
Swine Influenza Virus: Zoonotic Potential and Vaccination Strategies for the Control of Avian and Swine Influenzas
Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke
Last year researchers from Iowa State University in Ames warned that pigs located in industrial-scale farms were being subjected to influenza infections from farm poultry, wild birds and their human handlers. Writing in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke said, "As a result of the constantly changing genetic makeup of individual influenza viruses in pigs, the U.S. swine industry is continually scrambling to respond to the influenza viruses circulating within individual production systems."

15 July 2008

Volume 198, Number 2
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008;198:193–202
0022-1899/2008/19802-0007$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/589516
MAJOR ARTICLE

Transcriptome Profile of the Vascular Endothelial Cell Response to Candida albicans

Katherine S. Barker,1,3,a

Hyunsook Park,5,a

Quynh T. Phan,5

Lijing Xu,4

Ramin Homayouni,4

P. David Rogers,1,2,3 and

Scott G. Filler5,6

1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, and 2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, and Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 3Children’s Foundation Research Center, Le Bonheur Children’s Medical Center, 4Division of Bioinformatics, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Memphis, Tennessee; 5St. John’s Cardiovascular Research Center, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor–University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Medical Center, Torrance, 6The David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California

Background.During hematogenously disseminated candidiasis, bloodborne Candida albicans interacts with vascular endothelial cells (ECs), which have the capacity to influence the local inflammatory response to this organism.

Methods.To elucidate the EC response to C. albicans, we determined the transcriptional profile of ECs infected with wild‐type C. albicans strain SC5314 and a hypovirulent cph1Δ/cph1Δ efg1Δ/efg1Δ mutant, CAN34. These EC responses were also compared to our previously published data on the response of the macrophage‐like THP‐1 cell line to C. albicans.

Results.Infection with strain SC5314 induced upregulation of EC genes involved in chemotaxis, stress response, angiogenesis, and inhibition of apoptosis. Infection with CAN34 induced weaker expression of fewer genes. The angiogenic and anti‐apoptotic response of ECs to C. albicans did not occur in THP‐1 cells. However, there was upregulation of CCL3 and CCL4 expression in both cell types. Because CCR5 is the receptor for CCL3 and CCL4, we tested the susceptibility of CCR5−/− mice to disseminated candidiasis. The survival and renal fungal burden of the CCR5−/− mice were similar to that of wild‐type control mice.

Conclusions.ECs respond significantly differently to infection with C. albicans, compared with THP‐1 cells. CCR5 is dispensable for the host defense against disseminated candidiasis in immunocompetent mice.

Received 25 October 2007; accepted 5 February 2008; electronically published 22 May 2008.

Reprints or correspondence: Katherine S. Barker, PhD, Room 304 WPT Le Bonheur Children’s Medical Center, 50 North Dunlap Street, Memphis, TN 38103 ().
  • Potential conflicts of interest: S. G. F. has received research support from Amgen, Merck, and Pfizer, and has equity in NovaDigm Therapeutics. All other authors report no relevant conflicts.

    Presented in part: 8th Meeting on Candida and Candidiasis, Denver, Colorado, 13–17 March 2006 (abstract S4:3).

    Financial support: National Institutes of Health (grants R01AI054928 to S.G.F., R01AI019990 to S.G.F., R01AI058145 to P.D.R., and MO1RR00425 to S.G.F.); Toyota USA (donation of the Olympus phase‐contrast microscope used for these studies).

  • K. S. B. and H. P. contributed equally to this work.

Close Popup