All Journals > The American Naturalist > June 2008 > Different Visual Ranking of Avian Colors

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

Highlighted Article

"Density-dependent male mating harassment, female resistance and male mimicry"
Thomas P. Gosden and Erik I. Svensson


male blue-tailed damselfly matting with his doppelganger

A male mating with his female doppelganger (photo: Erik Svensson) 

Females in the blue-tailed damselfly (Ischnura elegans) occur in three different inherited color forms: green, red, and blue, with the blue form looking confusingly similar to males, perhaps to avoid repeated excessive sexual harassment. By dusting the males with a fluorescent powder, the authors monitored both the intensity of male mating harassment and the number of matings of the three female forms. The avoidance through male mimicry only seems to benefit the females when their “more attractive” sisters are at higher densities.

Press Release

Snapshot of Speciation
Study catches two bird populations as they split into seperate species

A new study finds that a change in a single gene has sent two closely related bird populations on their way to becoming two distinct species. The study, published in the August issue of The American Naturalist, is one of only a few to investigate the specific genetic changes that drive two populations toward speciation.

Parasites May Help Keep Sex On Top

What’s so great about sex? From an evolutionary perspective, the answer is not as obvious as one might think. An article published in the July issue of The American Naturalist suggests that sex may have evolved in part as a defense against parasites.

Michael J. Wade to Receive 2009 Sewall Wright Award

Harvard Biologist Jonathan Losos to Receive 2009 E. O. Wilson Naturalist Award

In the News

Featured in Scientific American
"Are Parasites To Thank for Sex?" July 8, 2009
The Maintenance of Sex, Clonal Dynamics, and Host-Parasite Coevolution in a Mixed Population of Sexual and Asexual Snails
Jukka Jokela, Mark F. Dybdahl, and Curtis M. Lively
A study in the journal The American Naturalist implies that parasites helped drive the development of sex, because the shuffling of genes gives sex-produced progeny an advantage over asexual genetic clones. Cynthia Graber reports.

Featured in ScienceNOW
"On the Road to a New Species" June 15, 2009
Difference in Plumage Color Used in Species Recognition between Incipient Species Is Linked to a Single Amino Acid Substitution in the Melanocortin‐1 Receptor
J. Albert C. Uy, Robert G. Moyle, Christopher E. Filardi, and Zachary A. Cheviron, Associate Editor: Ben C. Sheldon, Editor: Monica A. Geber
Next, the researchers evaluated whether this color change might make any difference to the birds. They put stuffed birds of either color into the territories of live flycatchers. Flycatchers are not bothered by most foreign birds, but they will attack potential rivals of the same species. Black bird decoys drew angry responses from black birds but little reaction from brown-belly birds and vice versa, Uy and his colleagues report in the August issue of The American Naturalist.

June 2008

Volume 171, Number 6
Am Nat 2008. Vol. 171, pp. 831–838
0003-0147/2008/17106-42691$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/587529

Different Ranking of Avian Colors Predicted by Modeling of Retinal Function in Humans and Birds

Olle Håstad1,* and

Anders Ödeen2,

1. School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Woodland Road, Bristol BS8 1UG, United Kingdom;

2. Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, S‐752 36 Uppsala, Sweden

Only during the past decade have vision‐system‐neutral methods become common practice in studies of animal color signals. Consequently, much of the current knowledge on sexual selection is based directly or indirectly on human vision, which may or may not emphasize spectral information in a signal differently from the intended receiver. In an attempt to quantify this discrepancy, we used retinal models to test whether human and bird vision rank plumage colors similarly. Of 67 species, human and bird models disagreed in 26 as to which pair of patches in the plumage provides the strongest color contrast or which male in a random pair is the more colorful. These results were only partly attributable to human UV blindness. Despite confirming a strong correlation between avian and human color discrimination, we conclude that a significant proportion of the information in avian visual signals may be lost in translation.

Submitted June 25, 2007; Accepted December 24, 2007; Electronically published April 22, 2008

Keywords:

sexual selection, color signals, plumage coloration, vision.

Associate Editor: Justin Marshall

Editor: Michael C. Whitlock

Close Popup