All Journals > The Journal of Infectious Diseases > 15 March 2008 > VZV‐Specific Responses in Elderly Zoster-Vaccine Recipients

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

  • By Author
  • Search In

Announcements

Science Watch logo

JID Article Named "New Hot Paper" by ScienceWatch.com

Dr. Lauri Hicks' 2007 article on pneumococcal disease has been named a "hot new paper" by Thompson Reuters' ScienceWatch.com. Read a Q&A about the article with Dr. Hicks here

Press Release

Unique Collaboration Charts the Migrations of a Parasite that Affected History
Researchers Sequence Louse DNA from Mummies and Propose New Model for its Development


In the News

Featured in Grist
"Another symptom of swine flu: instant amnesia" May 11, 2009
Swine Influenza Virus: Zoonotic Potential and Vaccination Strategies for the Control of Avian and Swine Influenzas
Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke
Read the veterinary literature on swine flu and you get a strong sense of what might be called vaccination treadmill: the hog industry is literally scrambling to generate new vaccines for the rapidly evolving flu strains that sweep through CAFOs. Writing in the Journal of Infectious Diseases [PDF] in 2008, Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke of Iowa State University paint a stark picture: “A number of genetically diverse viruses are circulating in swine herds throughout the world and are a major cause of concern to the swine industry,” they write. “Influenza virus infections in swine and poultry are potential sources of viruses for the next pandemic among humans.”

Featured in New York Times
"Fear of a Swine Flu Epidemic in 1976 Offers Some Lessons, and Concerns, Today" May 8, 2009
Anti‐Ganglioside Antibody Induction by Swine (A/NJ/1976/H1N1) and Other Influenza Vaccines: Insights into Vaccine‐Associated Guillain‐Barré Syndrome
Irving Nachamkin, Sean V. Shadomy, Anthony P. Moran, Nancy Cox, Collette Fitzgerald, Huong Ung, Adrian T. Corcoran, John K. Iskander, Lawrence B. Schonberger, and Robert T. Chen
Irving Nachamkin, a professor of pathology and laboratory medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, examined some 1976 vaccine that had been saved by a scientist in Texas. In a paper published last year in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, he and colleagues reported that mice given the vaccine made antibodies that reacted with gangliosides, which are components of nerve cells. An antibody attack on gangliosides is part of the disease mechanism of Guillain-Barré.

Featured in AFP
"Swine flu vaccine 'could be ready soon'" May 7, 2009
A Broadly Protective Vaccine against Globally Dispersed Clade 1 and Clade 2 H5N1 Influenza Viruses
Mary A. Hoelscher, Neetu Singh, Sanjay Garg, Lakshmi Jayashankar, Vic Veguilla, Aseem Pandey, Yumi Matsuoka, Jacqueline M. Katz, Ruben Donis, Suresh K. Mittal, and Suryaprakash Sambhara
The vaccine Mittal created for the bird flu worked on three different strains isolated over a seven-year period and was described in papers for the Journal of Infectious Diseases and the journal Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

Featured in Newsweek
"The Path of a Pandemic" http://www.newsweek.com/id/195692
Swine Influenza Virus: Zoonotic Potential and Vaccination Strategies for the Control of Avian and Swine Influenzas
Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke
Last year researchers from Iowa State University in Ames warned that pigs located in industrial-scale farms were being subjected to influenza infections from farm poultry, wild birds and their human handlers. Writing in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Eileen Thacker and Bruce Janke said, "As a result of the constantly changing genetic makeup of individual influenza viruses in pigs, the U.S. swine industry is continually scrambling to respond to the influenza viruses circulating within individual production systems."

15 March 2008

Volume 197, Number 6
The Journal of Infectious Diseases 2008;197:825–835
0022-1899/2008/19706-0008$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/528696
MAJOR ARTICLE

Varicella‐Zoster Virus–Specific Immune Responses in Elderly Recipients of a Herpes Zoster Vaccine

M. J. Levin,1

M. N. Oxman,2,3

J. H. Zhang,5

G. R. Johnson,5

H. Stanley,2,3

A. R. Hayward,1

M. J. Caulfield,6

M. R. Irwin,4

J. G. Smith,6

J. Clair,6

I. S. F. Chan,6

H. Williams,2,3

R. Harbecke,2,3

R. Marchese,6

S. E. Straus,7,a

A. Gershon,8

A. Weinberg,1 and the

Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Shingles Prevention Study Investigatorsb

1University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado; 2Department of Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System and 3University of California, San Diego, 4Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles; 5Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, West Haven, Connecticut; 6Merck Research Laboratories, Merck and Company, West Point, Pennsylvania; 7National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; 8Columbia University, New York, New York

Background.A double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial that involved 38,546 subjects 60 years old demonstrated efficacy of a high‐potency live‐attenuated Oka/Merck varicella‐zoster virus (VZV) vaccine. The trial included an immunology substudy to determine the relationship of VZV‐specific immune responses to vaccination and clinical outcome.

Methods.The immunology substudy enrolled 1395 subjects at 2 sites where blood samples obtained prior to vaccination, at 6 weeks after vaccination, and at 1, 2, and 3 years thereafter were tested for VZV‐specific cell‐mediated immunity (VZV‐CMI) by γ‐interferon ELISPOT and responder cell frequency assays and for VZV antibody by glycoprotein ELISA.

Results.VZV‐CMI and VZV antibodies were significantly increased in vaccine recipients at 6 weeks after vaccination. The vaccine‐induced increases in VZV‐CMI persisted during the 3 years of follow‐up, although their magnitude decreased over time. The magnitude of these VZV‐specific immune responses was greater in subjects 60–69 years old than in subjects 70 years old.

Conclusions.The zoster vaccine induced a significant increase in VZV‐CMI and VZV antibody. The magnitude and duration of the boost in VZV‐CMI in vaccine recipients and the relationship of this boost to age paralleled the clinical effects of the vaccine observed during the efficacy trial. These findings support the hypothesis that boosting VZV‐CMI protects older adults against herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia.

Received 18 July 2007; accepted 10 October 2007; electronically published 21 February 2008.

Reprints or correspondence: Myron J. Levin, MD, C227, 4200 E. 9th Ave., Denver, CO 80262 ().

Cited by

Anne A. Gershon, Myron J. Levin, Adriana Weinberg, Lin-Yee Song, Philip S. LaRussa, Sharon P. Steinberg, Patterson Bartlett. (2009) A PHASE I–II STUDY OF LIVE ATTENUATED VARICELLA-ZOSTER VIRUS VACCINE TO BOOST IMMUNITY IN HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS-INFECTED CHILDREN WITH PREVIOUS VARICELLA. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 28:7, 653-655
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
CrossRef
Stanley A. Plotkin. (2008) Vaccines: Correlates of Vaccine‐Induced Immunity. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:3, 401-409
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2008.
  • Presented in part: 44th annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, Toronto, 2006 (abstract 858), and the 4th Congress of the European Union Geriatric Medicine Society, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006 (abstract PP192).

    Potential conflicts of interest: M.J.L. claims intellectual property in a Merck & Co. patent on the use of VZV vaccine to prevent herpes zoster. M.J.L., A.W., and A.G. receive research funds and/or consultation fees from Merck & Co., or are on their Speakers Bureau. I.S.F.C., M.C., J.S., J.C., and R.M. are employees of Merck & Co., Inc. Merck stock or stock options are held by I.S.F.C., R.H., and H.W. (less than $10,000).

    Financial support: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (grant contract N01‐HD‐3–3345 to M.J.L.); Health Resources and Services Administration (H12HA00070 and NIAID U01 AI068632 to M.J.L.); Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology (grant to M.R.I.); NHLBI (grant R01 HL079955 to M.R.I.); NIA (grants R01 AG026364 and R01 AG026006–01 to M.R.I.); NCF (grant R01 CA 10014152 to M.R.I.); NIMH (grant T32MH19925 to M.R.I.); NIPS (grant P60 AG 10415 to M.R.I.); NCRR (grant M01‐RR00865 to M.R.I.); and NIAMS (grants R01 NR009228 and R01 AR049840 to M.R.I.). Additional support was provided by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Merck & Co., the National Institutes of Health (grant NIMH R01 MH 55253 to M.J.I.), and by the James R. and Jesse V. Scott Fund for Shingles Research (to M.N.O.).

  • Deceased.

  • Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Shingles Prevention Study Investigators are listed after the text.

Close Popup