All Journals > The American Naturalist > July 2007 > Sexual Selection and Color Vision in Primates

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

Highlighted Article

"Density-dependent male mating harassment, female resistance and male mimicry"
Thomas P. Gosden and Erik I. Svensson


male blue-tailed damselfly matting with his doppelganger

A male mating with his female doppelganger (photo: Erik Svensson) 

Females in the blue-tailed damselfly (Ischnura elegans) occur in three different inherited color forms: green, red, and blue, with the blue form looking confusingly similar to males, perhaps to avoid repeated excessive sexual harassment. By dusting the males with a fluorescent powder, the authors monitored both the intensity of male mating harassment and the number of matings of the three female forms. The avoidance through male mimicry only seems to benefit the females when their “more attractive” sisters are at higher densities.

Press Release

Snapshot of Speciation
Study catches two bird populations as they split into seperate species

A new study finds that a change in a single gene has sent two closely related bird populations on their way to becoming two distinct species. The study, published in the August issue of The American Naturalist, is one of only a few to investigate the specific genetic changes that drive two populations toward speciation.

Parasites May Help Keep Sex On Top

What’s so great about sex? From an evolutionary perspective, the answer is not as obvious as one might think. An article published in the July issue of The American Naturalist suggests that sex may have evolved in part as a defense against parasites.

Michael J. Wade to Receive 2009 Sewall Wright Award

Harvard Biologist Jonathan Losos to Receive 2009 E. O. Wilson Naturalist Award

In the News

Featured in Scientific American
"Are Parasites To Thank for Sex?" July 8, 2009
The Maintenance of Sex, Clonal Dynamics, and Host-Parasite Coevolution in a Mixed Population of Sexual and Asexual Snails
Jukka Jokela, Mark F. Dybdahl, and Curtis M. Lively
A study in the journal The American Naturalist implies that parasites helped drive the development of sex, because the shuffling of genes gives sex-produced progeny an advantage over asexual genetic clones. Cynthia Graber reports.

Featured in ScienceNOW
"On the Road to a New Species" June 15, 2009
Difference in Plumage Color Used in Species Recognition between Incipient Species Is Linked to a Single Amino Acid Substitution in the Melanocortin‐1 Receptor
J. Albert C. Uy, Robert G. Moyle, Christopher E. Filardi, and Zachary A. Cheviron, Associate Editor: Ben C. Sheldon, Editor: Monica A. Geber
Next, the researchers evaluated whether this color change might make any difference to the birds. They put stuffed birds of either color into the territories of live flycatchers. Flycatchers are not bothered by most foreign birds, but they will attack potential rivals of the same species. Black bird decoys drew angry responses from black birds but little reaction from brown-belly birds and vice versa, Uy and his colleagues report in the August issue of The American Naturalist.

July 2007

Volume 170, Number 1
Am Nat 2007. Vol. 170, pp. 10–20
0003-0147/2007/17001-41851$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/518566

Sexual Selection and Trichromatic Color Vision in Primates: Statistical Support for the Preexisting‐Bias Hypothesis

André A. Fernandez* and

Molly R. Morris

Department of Biological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701

Abstract:

The evolution of trichromatic color vision in primates may improve foraging performance as well as intraspecific communication; however, the context in which color vision initially evolved is unknown. We statistically examined the hypothesis that trichromatic color vision in primates represents a preexisting bias for the evolution of red coloration (pelage and/or skin) through sexual selection. Our analyses show that trichromatic color vision evolved before red pelage and red skin, as well as before gregarious mating systems that would promote sexual selection for visual traits and other forms of intraspecific communication via red traits. We also determined that both red pelage and red skin were more likely to evolve in the presence of color vision and mating systems that promote sexual selection. These results provide statistical support for the hypothesis that trichromatic color vision in primates evolved in a context other than intraspecific communication with red traits, most likely foraging performance, but, once evolved, represented a preexisting bias that promoted the evolution of red traits through sexual selection.

Submitted May 23, 2006; Accepted December 20, 2006; Electronically published May 21, 2007

Keywords:

sexual selection, preexisting bias, trichromatic color vision, foraging.

Associate Editor: Emília P. Martins

Editor: Monica A. Geber

Cited by

Rebecca C. Fuller. (2009) A TEST OF THE CRITICAL ASSUMPTION OF THE SENSORY BIAS MODEL FOR THE EVOLUTION OF FEMALE MATING PREFERENCE USING NEURAL NETWORKS. Evolution 63:7, 1697-1711
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
CrossRef
Toyomi Matsuno, Kazuo Fujita. (2009) A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates. Primates 50:2, 121-130
Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
CrossRef
Ellen J. Gerl, Molly R. Morris. (2008) The Causes and Consequences of Color Vision. Evolution: Education and Outreach 1:4, 476-486
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
CrossRef
S.D. Leonhardt, J. Tung, J.B. Camden, M. Leal, C.M. Drea. (2008) Seeing red: behavioral evidence of trichromatic color vision in strepsirrhine primates. Behavioral Ecology 20:1, 1-12
Online publication date: 11-Oct-2008.
CrossRef
B. C. Verrelli, C. M. Lewis, A. C. Stone, G. H. Perry. (2008) Different Selective Pressures Shape the Molecular Evolution of Color Vision in Chimpanzee and Human Populations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25:12, 2735-2743
Online publication date: 5-Sep-2008.
CrossRef
Brenda J. Bradley, Nicholas I. Mundy. (2008) The primate palette: The evolution of primate coloration. Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews 17:2, 97-111
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2008.
CrossRef
Close Popup