All Journals > Clinical Infectious Diseases > 1 February 2007 > Traveler’s Diarrhea Therapy in Thailand

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

  • By Author
  • Search In

Announcements

CID LISTED AMONG
“MOST INFLUENTIAL”

Clinical Infectious Diseases has been named as one of the "100 Most Influential Journals in Biology and Medicine" of the past 100 years by the Special Libraries Association. The list was compiled by the 680-plus members of SLA’s Biomedical and Life Sciences Division.

See the full list here.

Source: The DBIO 100, the 100 Most Influential Journals in Biology & Medicine over the last 100 Years

In the News

Featured in MSNBC
"Germs and flu are up; infection control is down" June 9, 2009
Trends in the Incidence of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection in Children’s Hospitals in the United States
Jeffrey S. Gerber, Susan E. Coffin, Sarah A. Smathers, and Theoklis E. Zaoutis
Just this week, researchers reported that the incidence of MRSA infections among children admitted to pediatric hospitals in the United States more than tripled between 2002 and 2007. Researchers at the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and the University of Pennsylvania found cases of MRSA jumped from 6.7 per 1,000 admissions in 2002 to 21.1 cases per 1,000 admissions in 2007, according to a study released online Monday in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases.

Featured in Toronto Star
"Pigs, viruses and politics" May 2, 2009
Are Swine Workers in the United States at Increased Risk of Infection with Zoonotic Influenza Virus?
Kendall P. Myers, Christopher W. Olsen, Sharon F. Setterquist, Ana W. Capuano, Kelley J. Donham, Eileen L. Thacker, James A. Merchant, and Gregory C. Gray
Another study, this one published in the U.S. journal Clinical Infectious Diseases in 2006, found that workers in meat-processing plants have a greater likelihood of being infected by some version of the H1N1 flu virus than the general population (the odds of pig farmers getting the disease are significantly greater again).

Featured in Philadelphia Inquirer
"A shot in the arm for vaccines" April 19, 2009
Vaccines: Pneumococcal Vaccination of Elderly Adults: New Paradigms for Protection
Lisa A. Jackson and Edward N. Janoff
Every year, an estimated 915,000 people 65 and older get pneumonia, and 40 percent of them end up in hospitals, according to a 2004 paper in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases. Pneumonia often kills older people, said Richard Stefanacci, a geriatrician at the University of the Sciences in Philadelphia.

1 February 2007

Volume 44, Number 3
Clinical Infectious Diseases 2007;44:338–346
1058-4838/2007/4403-0005
DOI: 10.1086/510589
MAJOR ARTICLE

Traveler’s Diarrhea in Thailand: Randomized, Double‐Blind Trial Comparing Single‐Dose and 3‐Day Azithromycin‐Based Regimens with a 3‐Day Levofloxacin Regimen

David R. Tribble,1

John W. Sanders,2

Lorrin W. Pang,6

Carl Mason,6

Chittima Pitarangsi,6

Shahida Baqar,1

Adam Armstrong,2

Paul Hshieh,3

Anne Fox,2

Elisabeth A. Maley,4

Carlos Lebron,5

Dennis J. Faix,3

James V. Lawler,2

Gautam Nayak,2

Michael Lewis,6

Ladaporn Bodhidatta,6 and

Daniel A. Scott1

1Enteric Diseases Department, Naval Medical Research Center, Silver Spring, 2National Naval Medical Center, and 3Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; 4Naval Medical Center, San Diego, San Diego, California; 5Navy Environmental Preventive Medicine Unit 6, Pearl Harbor, Hawaii; and 6Armed Forces Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, Thailand

Background.Traveler’s diarrhea in Thailand is frequently caused by Campylobacter jejuni. Rates of fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance in Campylobacter organisms have exceeded 85% in recent years, and reduced fluoroquinolone efficacy has been observed.

Methods.Azithromycin regimens were evaluated in a randomized, double‐blind trial of azithromycin, given as a single 1‐g dose or a 3‐day regimen (500 mg daily), versus a 3‐day regimen of levofloxacin (500 mg daily) in military field clinics in Thailand. Outcomes included clinical end points (time to the last unformed stool [TLUS] and cure rates) and microbiological end points (pathogen eradication).

Results.A total of 156 patients with acute diarrhea were enrolled in the trial. Campylobacter organisms predominated (in 64% of patients), with levofloxacin resistance noted in 50% of Campylobacter organisms and with no azithromycin resistance noted. The cure rate at 72 h after treatment initiation was highest (96%) with single‐dose azithromycin, compared with the cure rates of 85% noted with 3‐day azithromycin and 71% noted with levofloxacin ( ). Single‐dose azithromycin was also associated with the shortest median TLUS (35 h; , by log‐rank test). Levofloxacin's efficacy was inferior to azithromycin's efficacy, except in patients with no pathogen identified during the first 24 h of treatment or in patients with levofloxacin‐susceptible Campylobacter isolates, in whom it appeared to be equal to azithromycin. The rate of microbiological eradication was significantly better with azithromycin‐based regimens (96%–100%), compared with levofloxacin (38%) ( ); however, this finding was poorly correlated with clinical outcome. A higher rate of posttreatment nausea in the 30 min after receipt of the first dose (14% vs. <6%; ) was observed as a mild, self‐limited complaint associated with single‐dose azithromycin.

Conclusions.Single‐dose azithromycin is recommended for empirical therapy of traveler’s diarrhea acquired in Thailand and is a reasonable first‐line option for empirical management in general.

Received 12 June 2006; accepted 19 September 2006; electronically published 28 December 2006.

  • (See the editorial commentary by DuPont on pages 347–9)

Reprints or correspondence: Dr. David R. Tribble, Enteric Diseases Dept., Rm. 3E21, Naval Medical Research Center, 503 Robert Grant Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20910‐7500 ().

Cited by

H. L. DUPONT. (2009) Systematic review: the epidemiology and clinical features of travellers’ diarrhoea. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics 30:3, 187-196
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009.
CrossRef
Miguel M. Cabada, A. Clinton White. (2008) Travelers’ diarrhea: An update on susceptibility, prevention, and treatment. Current Gastroenterology Reports 10:5, 473-479
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
CrossRef
Mark S. Riddle, Sarah Arnold, and David R. Tribble. (2008) Effect of Adjunctive Loperamide in Combination with Antibiotics on Treatment Outcomes in Traveler’s Diarrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Clinical Infectious Diseases 47:8, 1007-1014
Online publication date: 15-Oct-2008.
David R. Hill, Edward T. Ryan, David O. Freedman, Frank J. Bia, Philip R. Fischer, Jay S. Keystone, Phyllis E. Kozarsky, and Richard D. Pearson. (2008) Reply to Connor. Clinical Infectious Diseases 46:3, 476-477
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008.
G. Birkenfeld. (2008) Therapie der Reisediarrhö. Der Internist 48:12, 1358-1364
Online publication date: 1-Jan-2008.
CrossRef
John W. Sanders, Robert W. Frenck, Shannon D. Putnam, Mark S. Riddle, James R. Johnston, Sefa Ulukan, David M. Rockabrand, Marshall R. Monteville, and David R. Tribble. (2007) Azithromycin and Loperamide Are Comparable to Levofloxacin and Loperamide for the Treatment of Traveler’s Diarrhea in United States Military Personnel in Turkey. Clinical Infectious Diseases 45:3, 294-301
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2007.
David R. Tribble. (2007) Reply to Genton and D’Acremont. Clinical Infectious Diseases 44:11, 1521-1522
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007.
Blaise Genton and Valérie D’Acremont. (2007) Evidence of Efficacy Is Not Enough to Develop Recommendations: Antibiotics for Treatment of Traveler’s Diarrhea. Clinical Infectious Diseases 44:11, 1520-1520
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2007.
Herbert L. DuPont. (2007) Editorial Commentary: Azithromycin for the Self‐Treatment of Traveler’s Diarrhea. Clinical Infectious Diseases 44:3, 347-349
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2007.
  • Presented in part: 8th Conference of the International Society of Travel Medicine, 7–11 May 2003, New York City, New York (abstract FC10.02).

    The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Navy, Department of Defense, or the US Government. The corresponding author is an employee of the US Government. This work was prepared as part of my official duties. Title 17 US Code 101 defines a US Government work as a work prepared by a military service member or employee of the US Government as part of that person’s official duties.

Close Popup