All Journals > Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology > July 2006 > Acquisition of MDR Organisms From Critically Ill Patients

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

  • By Author
  • Search In

Highlighted Article

NHSN Annual Update:
Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections

Annual Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007

Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens that cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose an ongoing and increasing challenge to hospitals, both in the clinical treatment of patients and in the prevention of the cross-transmission of these problematic pathogens.  Describing the magnitude of the problem with respect to these antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is challenging, because the levels of antimicrobial resistance vary for different types of healthcare facilities and for different geographic areas, and some resistance phenotypes are difficult for laboratories to detect. However, the findings from such attempts may help the infection control and public health communities target problems and utilize resources more efficiently.

In the News

Featured in The Times
"Ireland 'losing war' on superbug" February 15, 2009
Challenges of Implementing National Guidelines for the Control and Prevention of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization or Infection in Acute Care Hospitals in the Republic of Ireland
Fidelma Fitzpatrick, MD; Fiona Roche, PhD; Robert Cunney, MB; Hilary Humphreys, MD; Strategy for the Control of Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland Infection Control Subcommittee
The research, published in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, found one third of hospitals did not have a written policy on antibiotic use, and only 35% had an antibiotic stewardship programme.

July 2006

Volume 27, Number 7
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:675–681
0899-823X/2006/2707-0007$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/505919
Original Article

Acquisition of Multidrug‐Resistant Organisms Among Hospital Patients Hospitalized in Beds Adjacent to Critically Ill Patients

Matan J. Cohen, MD, MPH;

Olga Anshelevich, MD;

David Raveh, MD;

Ellen Broide, BSc;

Bernard Rudensky, PhD;

Amos M. Yinnon, MD

From the Infectious Diseases Unit (M.J.C., O.A., D.R., E.B., A.M.Y.), the Department of Geriatrics (O.A.), and the Clinical Microbiology Laboratory (E.B., B.R.), Shaare Zedek Medical Center (affiliated with the faculty of Health Sciences, Ben‐Gurion University of the Negev, Beer‐Sheva, Israel), and the Hebrew University–Hadassah Medical School (M.J.C., A.M.Y.), Jerusalem, Israel.

Objective.To assess whether patients hospitalized in beds physically adjacent to critically ill patients are at increased risk to acquire multidrug‐resistant pathogens.

Design.Cohort study.

Setting.Shaare Zedek Medical Center, a 550‐bed medical referral center.

Patients.From April to September 2004, we enrolled consecutive newly admitted patients who were hospitalized in beds adjacent to either mechanically ventilated patients or patients designated as “do not resuscitate” (DNR). For each of these patients, we also enrolled a control patient who was not hospitalized in a bed adjacent to a critically ill patient. We collected specimens from the anterior nares, the oral cavity, and the perianal zone at the time of admission and subsequently at 3‐day intervals until discharge or death. Specimens were cultured on selective media to detect growth of antibiotic‐resistant pathogens, including Acinetobacter baumannii, methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), extended‐spectrum β lactamase (ESBL)–producing Enterobacteriaceae, and vancomycin‐resistant enterococci (VRE).

Results.We enrolled 46 neighbor‐control pairs. Among neighbors and controls, respectively, the incidence rates for isolation of A. baumannii was 8.3 and 4 isolations per 100 patient‐days (relative risk [RR], 2.1 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.8‐5.2]; ), the incidence rates for MRSA were 1.4 and 2.6 isolations per 100 patient‐days (RR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.1‐2.3]; ), the incidence rates for ESBL‐producing Enterobacteriaceae were 10.5 and 9 isolations per 100 patient‐days (RR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.6‐2.4]; ), the incidence rates for VRE were 4.3 and 4.8 isolations per 100 patient‐days (RR, 0.9 [95% CI, 0.3‐2.4]; ), and the composite incidence rate was 21.7 and 16.2 isolations per 100 patient‐days (RR, 1.3 [95% CI, 0.8‐2.3]; ).

Conclusions.In this pilot study, we did not detect an increased incidence rate of isolation of multidrug‐resistant pathogens among patients hospitalized in beds adjacent to critically ill patients. Further studies with larger samples should be conducted in order to generate valid data and provide patients, physicians, and policy makers with a sufficient knowledge base from which decisions can be made.

Received May 31, 2005; accepted August 19, 2005; electronically published June 20, 2006.

Address requests for reprints to Matan Cohen, MD, Infectious Disease Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, P.O. Box 3235, Jerusalem 91031, Israel ().

Cited by

Shmuel Benenson, MD; Matan J. Cohen, MD, MPH; Colin Block, MBBCh, PhD; Sagit Stern, BMedSci; Yuval Weiss, MD, MPH; Allon E. Moses, MD; JIRMI Group. (2009) Vancomycin‐Resistant Enterococci in Long‐Term Care Facilities •. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 30:8, 786-789
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009.
Reuven Friedmann, MD; David Raveh, MD; Esther Zartzer, MD; Bernard Rudensky, PhD; Ellen Broide, BSc; Denise Attias, BSc; Amos M. Yinnon, MD. (2009) Prospective Evaluation of Colonization with Extended‐Spectrum β‐Lactamase (ESBL)–Producing Enterobacteriaceae Among Patients at Hospital Admission and of Subsequent Colonization with ESBL‐Producing Enterobacteriaceae Among Patients During Hospitalization •. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology 30:6, 534-542
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
Close Popup