All Journals > Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology > May 2006 > Oral Streptococci in Dental Unit Water Lines

Article Tools

Search for Related Articles

Highlighted Article

NHSN Annual Update:
Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections

Annual Summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006–2007

Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens that cause healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) pose an ongoing and increasing challenge to hospitals, both in the clinical treatment of patients and in the prevention of the cross-transmission of these problematic pathogens.  Describing the magnitude of the problem with respect to these antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is challenging, because the levels of antimicrobial resistance vary for different types of healthcare facilities and for different geographic areas, and some resistance phenotypes are difficult for laboratories to detect. However, the findings from such attempts may help the infection control and public health communities target problems and utilize resources more efficiently.

In the News

Featured in The Times
"Ireland 'losing war' on superbug" February 15, 2009
Challenges of Implementing National Guidelines for the Control and Prevention of Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization or Infection in Acute Care Hospitals in the Republic of Ireland
Fidelma Fitzpatrick, MD; Fiona Roche, PhD; Robert Cunney, MB; Hilary Humphreys, MD; Strategy for the Control of Antimicrobial Resistance in Ireland Infection Control Subcommittee
The research, published in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, found one third of hospitals did not have a written policy on antibiotic use, and only 35% had an antibiotic stewardship programme.

May 2006

Volume 27, Number 5
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2006;27:504–509
0899-823X/2006/2705-0013$15.00
DOI: 10.1086/504500
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Detection and Quantification of Dental Unit Water Line Contamination by Oral Streptococci

Stefano Petti, DMD,;

Gianfranco Tarsitani MD

From the Department of Public Health Sciences “G. Sanarelli,” University “La Sapienza,” Rome, Italy (both authors).

Objective.(1) To investigate the prevalence of oral streptococci (OS) and biological indicators of water contamination by oral fluids in water from dental unit water lines (DUWs) by detection and quantification and of saprophytes indigenous to the oral cavity. (2) To test whether measurement of the total cultivable mesophilic flora (TCF), the parameter commonly used to monitor water quality in DUWs, is an effective predictor for OS contamination.

Design.Survey of 21 dental units equipped with antiretraction devices. Water samples were collected from air‐water syringes, cup fillers, tap water, and before and during the working day.

Setting.Units were from 7 public dental offices selected for convenience from among those in proximity of the microbiological laboratory.

Methods.For detection of OS, samples were plated on an enriched medium, to revitalize the organisms. Colonies were subcultured on a selective medium and biochemically identified (lower detection limit, 1 cfu/mL). For measurement of the TCF, samples were plated on a nutrient‐poor medium. Cultures with colony counts greater than 200 cfu/mL were considered to be TCF positive. The sensitivity and specificity of TCF positivity in predicting OS detection was calculated.

Results.Prevalence rates for OS contamination and for TCF positivity were, respectively, 34.4% (11 of 32 samples) and 25.0% (8 of 32 samples) for syringes, 27.8% (10 of 36 samples) and 8.3% (3 of 36 samples) for cup fillers, and 0.0% (0 of 7 samples) for tap water. OS contamination levels ranged from 1 to 6 cfu/mL. No statistically significant differences were found between samples obtained before and during the working day. TCF positivity did not predict OS contamination effectively, because of low sensitivity.

Conclusions.Given the absence of OS in tap water, the reported prevalence of OS contamination suggests that oral fluids are aspirated during dental therapy with relatively high frequency and that DUWs can potentially expose successive patients to bloodborne cross‐infections.

Received December 19, 2003; accepted June 21, 2004; electronically published April 20, 2006.

Address reprint requests to Prof. Stefano Petti, Dept. Public Health Sciences “G. Sanarelli,” University “La Sapienza,” P.le Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy ().

Cited by

D.C. Coleman, M.J. O’Donnell, A.C. Shore, R.J. Russell. (2009) Biofilm problems in dental unit water systems and its practical control. Journal of Applied Microbiology 106:5, 1424-1437
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2009.
CrossRef
Close Popup