Shooting the Beholder
Charles Schreyvogel and the Spectacle of Gun Vision
Charles Schreyvogel (1861–1912) produced some of the most visually striking paintings of the American West at the turn of the twentieth century. This essay explores the importance of guns and shooting in structuring Schreyvogel’s art, within and beneath manifest narrative content or iconography. Often pointed directly at the beholder or placed in striking angles and directions, guns in his paintings do more than reconstruct the mythic history of Western conquest. Schreyvogel deployed the gun as a powerful visual device that dramatized that history in new ways while advertising his knowledge of military weapons and marksmanship. As an organizing motif, the gun also helped Schreyvogel make his otherwise traditional realism unusually eye‐catching to modern viewers at a time of personal financial distress and changing fortunes for academic oil painters generally. In a marketplace of imagery increasingly saturated with and transformed by new media, Schreyvogel shrewdly adapted oil painting to new conditions of pictorial production and spectatorship. With its close juxtaposition of the pistol barrel and eye of an aiming cavalry trooper – metaphorically equating seeing with shooting – Schreyvogel’s painting Breaking Through the Line epitomizes his contribution to a broader, modern discourse that the author calls “gun vision.”
-
Alan C. Braddock teaches American art history and visual culture at Syracuse University. His research focuses on realism, race, anthropology, film, and eco‐criticism. His articles have appeared in Winterthur Portfolio, Nineteenth‐Century Art Worldwide, and American Quarterly. He is currently preparing books on Thomas Eakins and on “gun vision.”
-
This essay grew out of a paper delivered at the Southwest Art History Conference in Taos, New Mexico, in 2004. Initial research was conducted during a fellowship at the Georgia O'Keeffe Museum Research Center in Santa Fe, New Mexico. Faculty colleagues in the Department of Fine Arts at Syracuse University offered helpful suggestions at a subsequent reading of that paper. The author particularly thanks Michael Leja, Alexander Nemerov, Karen Sherry, Mark White, and the anonymous readers for American Art for their thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of the present essay, which constitutes part of a book project in progress tentatively entitled Gun Vision: American Art and Logistical Perception, 1861–1918
