All Journals > Journal of Political Economy > February 2004 > Entry, Pricing, and Product Design

Search for Related Articles

Announcements

MILTON FRIEDMAN ON ECONOMICS BOOK NOW AVAILABLE

Upon his death in the autumn of 2006, Milton Friedman was lauded as “the grandmaster of free-market economic theory in the postwar era” by The New York Times and “the most influential economist of the second half of the twentieth century” by The Economist. Winner of the Nobel Prize in Economics in 1976, Friedman was both a highly respected economist and a prominent public intellectual, the leader of a revolution in economic and political thought that argued robustly in favor of the virtues of free markets and laissez-faire policies.

Press Release

Study Separates Russian Flat Tax Myth and Fact

A study published in the Journal of Political Economy finds that flat tax reform in Russia decreased tax evasion, but did little to increase real income for households

In the News

Featured in Guardian
"From Russia with Laffer, a tax cut tale" June 23, 2009

Myth and Reality of Flat Tax Reform: Micro Estimates of Tax Evasion Response and Welfare Effects in Russia


"The study on Russia, published in this month's Journal of Political Economy, found that although the tax cut did increase tax compliance, it did nothing to boost the work ethic." --Christopher Swann, columnist for Reuters

February 2004 Supplement

Volume 112, Number S1
[Journal of Political Economy, 2004, vol. 112, no. S1]
0022-3808/2004/11201S1-0017$10.00
DOI: 10.1086/380084

Entry, Pricing, and Product Design in an Initially Monopolized Market

Steven J. Davis,

Kevin M. Murphy, and

Robert H. Topel

University of Chicago and National Bureau of Economic Research

We analyze entry, pricing, and product design in a model with differentiated products. Market equilibrium can be “separating,” with multiple sellers and a sorting of heterogeneous consumers across goods, or “exclusionary,” with one seller serving all customer types. Entry into an initially monopolized market can occur because of cost reductions or product improvements, but entry need not lower the incumbent’s price, improve efficiency, or raise consumer welfare. Postentry design incentives favor a softening of price competition and stronger market segmentation, whereas exclusionary design changes typically raise consumer welfare. Potential, as distinct from actual, entry always benefits consumers.

  • We thank Sherwin Rosen, Judy Chevalier, David Evans, Drew Fudenberg, Bernard Reddy, Lars Stole, Jean Tirole, an anonymous referee, and workshop participants at Brown University, the University of Chicago, the University of Missouri, Texas A&M, and the U.S. Department of Justice for helpful comments on earlier drafts. We also thank Walter Oi, our discussant, and other participants in a conference held in May 2001 at the University of Chicago to honor the memory of Sherwin Rosen. We gratefully acknowledge research support from Microsoft Corporation. Errors are our responsibility.

Close Popup